 |
| I'm sorry. I can't hear you over the sound of how AWESOME I am! |
I
love Hollywood. I love the spectacle and
the glitter. I love the experience of
awesome that Hollywood can create.
Most
of all, I love the license they take. Hollywood
looks at an old legend, say William Tell, and thinks, “Ooo, what if instead of
one crossbow, he had two? And what if
they shot flaming arrows? And what if, instead
of his son he had to save a busty, scantily clad and mostly mute damsel in
distress? Now there’s a movie. Get me a
director!”
It
is most likely thanks for Hollywood (and Professor Tolkien) that I developed a
love-affair with archers and archery.
Errol Flynn was my first introduction to the fable of Robin Hood, and it
couldn’t have been better. The Adventures of Robin Hood is classic,
iconic Hollywood in all its glorious Technicolor. It’s the epitome of dashing heroes, beautiful
heroines, dastardly villains and sword-waving, arrow-shooting awesomeness.
 |
| You call that archery? |
Of
course, three decades of reading and writing and obsessing about archery have
given me some insights into the many splendid anachronisms and failures that
Hollywood has created, latched onto and never, ever let go.
Let’s
look at just one example that you might not think about much: the archer’s quiver.
Because
we’re talking Hollywood, and because most Hollywood archers tend to hail from
Medieval Europe or a European-based cognate, I’m only going to focus on that.
Now,
the quiver is a pretty simple and straight-forward device. You’re an archer, you need to carry your
arrows about, and holding them your hand is both awkward and leaves sweat
stains on the shaft. Not at all the kind
of thing that a scantily-blad, buxom beauty would find appealing in her
hero. What’s a brazen archer to do? Put then in a “holder”. Leather is traditional, but quivers have also
been made of wood and cloth.
Now,
you’ve got your quiver, but you’re still carrying it around. Sure, the arrow shafts aren’t all nasty with
sweat, but it’s still cutting down on your ability to swing from
chandeliers. Solution: wear the quiver.
 |
| Well, I am an Elf. |
Here’s
where Hollywood gets it all kinds of wrong.
A quiver slung on the back isn’t unheard of (Native Americans, African
tribes, and the Japanese use back quivers), but for Europeans this just flies
in the face of historical accuracy. A quiver
on the back does look cool, but if
you’ve ever tried this (and I have) you immediately find a host of
problems. Just reaching the arrows over
your shoulder by touch only seems to be a super-power in itself.
Almost all European iconography (tapestries, paintings and illustrations) show that archers wore their quivers on their hip.
Almost all European iconography (tapestries, paintings and illustrations) show that archers wore their quivers on their hip.
 |
| Archers from the Bayeux Tapestry. |
Even
this is a bit misleading, because the tapestries and whatnot are just general
representations. They aren’t a
photograph. We know from contemporary
historians and piles of evidence that archers often used an arrow bag, like a
giant quiver. This allowed for them to
be very effective in mass-fire techniques, shooting about ten to twelve arrows
every minute.
So,
while I’m a big fan of Legolas, Hawkeye, Green Arrow, and, of course Robin Hood
in all his incarnations, it should be generally assumed that these are not
overly accurate depictions of real-life archers. They are Hollywood archers, which means they’re
bigger, better, faster, stronger, more accurate, and able to shoot a Nazgul on
a flying steed, out of the sky, at night, with a single, thin shaft.
True
story.
