No words on this one. Sorry. |
This
is not my argument. It was made by a friend of mine. It so accurately sums up the issues that I’ve
stolen it and provided it here:
Guns don't kill
people, people kill people. So we're told gun control isn't the answer. You
can't sue the gun makers or make it difficult for people get guns, even if
there are signs that they'd be dangerous.
People don't kill
themselves, the opioids are killing them. So we're told we need to take the
opioids away. We should go after the drug makers and doctors, and make it very
difficult for people in pain to get relief.
So... we have to
take something that can be useful away from you, because you might use it to
harm yourself.
But we have to
make sure you can get all the guns you want, even though they're useless unless
you're hurting someone.
This isn't logic,
it's twisted moralizing.
In
the overall scheme of firearm death/violence, “mass shootings” are not, in
themselves, that big of a problem—they only account for a small percentage of
the overall death. They do, however,
quickly underline in blood and tears and loss the exact nature of the
problem. Humans are now and may always
be too emotional, too irrational, too prone to violence to be responsible
enough as a species to be trusted with firearms.
No comments:
Post a Comment