So dirty! |
Never
in the history of humankind has there been a more divisive subject.
There
has never been a war, a battle or a barroom brawl without first some poor soul
uttered the word, “prologue”.
And
yet, here we are.
Here
we are . . .
Prologues
are loved/hated depending on the individual and I’m not here to tell you that
your opinion is wrong (although it probably is). There are five-dozen articles on whether you
should or shouldn’t include a prologue.
I
counted. Twice.
Instead,
it’s important to understand what a prologue is, and how to use it
appropriately. Back in the day, if a
fantasy story didn’t have a prologue, it probably wasn’t any good. Robert Jordan took that idea to an extreme so
great that his prologues could have been their own publication—although the
reader was almost never the wiser after finishing a Jordan prologue.
Long, long ago prologues. |
There-in
lies the first problem of prologues—misuse.
So,
let’s boil this down quickly: What is a prologue? How is it used appropriately?
Simple.
The
prologue provides information from a different time/place that can't be had
within the narrative, but is integral to the story. As the first thing your
readers read, it must serve the
purpose of fully engaging the audience, drawing them in and keep them turning
pages.
That’s
it. If you keep those two things in mind
while writing a “prologue” then you’re good to go. Don’t make it an information dump. Don’t try to build the entire world. Don’t be too vague. Don’t use it only to set mood.
Think
murder-mystery books, which make the most common and most effective use the
prologue—an overview of the crime and a few hints as to the resolution. Or Harry
Potter and the Philosopher’s Sorcerer’s Stone, which uses the prologue perfectly. In both cases, the prologue is set before the
events of the book(s), grabs the audience’s attention and provides information
integral to the story but otherwise unknowable.
Prologues
have such a bad reputation—hanging out on the wrong side of the tracks, smoking
cigarettes and getting tattoos—that some readers will roll up the windows and
drive past quickly. Personally, if the
book was good enough to make me crack the cover, then I’ll trust in my author
to not break our contract just because the word “prologue” appears. It’s part of the reading experience, the art
the writer is delivering, and I’ll trust the artist until I don’t.
I fall on the love prologues side, though I definitely acknowledge that they have been misused A LOT.
ReplyDeleteYou have a great, simple pair of objectives for a prologue! I agree completely.
Thank you!
Delete