Literally. |
“Go
ahead, see which super-spy you preferred.”
“’Ello,
Goldfinger.”
“No. Mister Bond!
I don’t believe it! I expected
you to die.”
Even
if you could rattle off ten quick cover identities (NERD!), the point is that
name recognition of Bond, James Bond is so great, that it encompasses the
entire film genre itself. The opening
sequence of Vin Diesel’s XXX went so
far as to feature a Bond-like character and quickly kill him off just to show
that this was not going to be a Bond-esque spy-film—even though it was.
The
same goes for writers. There are some
big, bigger, and biggest names out in the world of writing. Some of them, like Robert Jordan, are
actually nom de plumes, a pen name for the author’s given name—James Oliver
Rigney, Jr. Mr. Jordan, ne Rigney, also
wrote some historical fiction under the pseudonym Reagen O'Neal, a western as Jackson
O'Reilly and dance critiques as Chang Lung.
No, I'm not making that last one up.
No, I'm not making that last one up.
Jordan
is the perfect example, pre-internet, of how and why an author might want to
use one or more pen names to separate very different kinds of work. Or, alternately, a writer with multiple
personality disorder. Your call. Generally, this was his attempt to lend
credibility to each piece on its own, and not have it associated with the
nature of the other pieces. In short,
someone reading Jordan’s “Wheel of Time” series wouldn’t discount his criticism
of dance because he was a fantasy writer. I'm still not making that up.
There
are similar reasons that writers would like to distance their two (or more) writing
products. J.D. Robb is the erotic futuristic suspense genre writer who is also Nora Roberts, mild-mannered romance
writer. Stephen King published
additional novels under the Richard Bachman pen name, because publishers didn’t
think that readers would buy more than one novel from the same author per year.
Yeah, try telling that to fans of George R.R. Martin or Patrick Rothfuss!
Yeah, try telling that to fans of George R.R. Martin or Patrick Rothfuss!
That awesome moment . . . |
There
are also some, sadly, sexist and bigoted reasons for authors to select a pen name. Female authors writing genre fiction have
suffered this most recently. Andre
Norton legally changed her name from Alice Mary Norton after writing for some
time under that pen name. And if I say Carolyn
Janice Cherry, not many readers will know who I mean. However, C.J. Cherryh (which is still
pronounced “Cherry”) is widely known to science fiction fans everywhere.
There
are myriad reasons, some good, some not so much, to write under a pseudonym. The coolest reason, of course, is to have a “secret
identity” that everyone talks about at parties and around a baccarat table where
the author silently, smugly, anonymously sips a vodka martini, shaken, not
stirred.
For most writers, while this is appealing, it isn’t practical. It can create confusion in readers who would like to know more about their author and find more books to buy. Interviews can become tricky, unless strictly controlled, and book readings/signings are something of a strange dance of: Is she or isn’t she? In the internet age, if someone wants to know an author’s “real name” they are likely going to be able to find out. No matter the layers of protection in place, these things have a way of find their way into the light.
For most writers, while this is appealing, it isn’t practical. It can create confusion in readers who would like to know more about their author and find more books to buy. Interviews can become tricky, unless strictly controlled, and book readings/signings are something of a strange dance of: Is she or isn’t she? In the internet age, if someone wants to know an author’s “real name” they are likely going to be able to find out. No matter the layers of protection in place, these things have a way of find their way into the light.
Just
as Robert Galbraith did—a.k.k. J.K. Rowling.
No comments:
Post a Comment