CHAPPiE is one of
the latest in a slew of near science fiction films that explores the idea of
artificial
Do you want to play a game? |
These missed opportunities for potential depth are not necessarily
a bad thing. Blomkamp has a good sense
of pacing, and the movie stays on target throughout the climatic scenes to
deliver on all the promises offered from the first two acts. But the questions of AI, and its seemingly
inevitable birth into our world, are ones that both fascinate and frighten me. Given proper time, Blomkamp would have had to
make three (or more) movies to properly explore the major themes he offers more
in passing through this scifi/action thriller.
In Ex Machina, a
very slow-paced and thoughtful look at the question of AI, when character Nathan
Bateman (well-played by Oscar Isaac) is accused of creating artificial consciousness
without considering the effect, he offers (and I’m working from faulty memory
here) that AI was never about one person creating it. Instead, it is an inevitability of a process
that we mere mortals put into motion long ago.
It’s what theorists call the Singularity.
If you’re thinking that this is pure science fiction, you’ll
definitely want to check out this Ted Talk with Martine Rothblatt, who created
Sirius Radio, and founded United Therapeutics.
We may be days, years or decades off from true AI, but it’s certainly
coming, and the myriad uncertainty and questions that come with it remain
wholly unanswered.
This is where CHAPPiE
falls down, not as a movie, but as a vision of the future where AI, placed into
a police/military-grade robot, has abilities far-exceeding human
limitations. One of the first missed
opportunities comes when Chappie himself has the chance to question his creator
Deon (excellently played by Dev Patel) as to why he would put the AI into a
body doomed to die. This is exactly the
conversation most people would love to have with our own “creator”. It’s the start of a slew of deep self-aware
questions for which humans have been struggling to answer throughout our
existence, and which have led, directly, to the creation of AI.
Don't worry, he's only an analog! |
The film also provides a very brief, nearly glossed over
religious response in the character of Vincent (Hugh Jackman). Blomkamp provides no hand-holding with
Vincent’s character, and so if you’re not careful, you’ll miss his all-too-few
religiously-based, wholly negative, responses to the question of AI. Time really isn’t on Vincent’s side to share
with the audience the basis for his feelings and his personal bias (which is
strange for a guy in the heart of the robotics industry). But the message is clear enough—a spiritual
crisis will likely exist for humans in general and theists specifically when
mankind creates unique, individual, self-aware life.
Finally, and possibly the worst sin of the movie, is the
question of consciousness. If you
watched the Ted Talk about with Rothblatt, you can see that she’s not talking
about transference of everything that is RobRoy into an immortal frame. Instead, she’s talking about (nearly)
everything that makes up RobRoy, to the extent that technology currently will
allow, and creating a unique analog that is RobRoy 2.0. Such a creation is separate from me in all
respects, except how others will view him, and how he will interact with them. For Chappie, though, consciousness, despite
Deon’s admittance that human don’t understand it, is wholly definable by the
AI, and potentially transferable. This
isn’t RobRoy 2.0. This is RobRoy,
leaving his 40+ year old, frail, battered and disease-stricken body, and being
place . . . anywhere. In a computer
mainframe, in an internet cloud, in the titanium body of a military-grade robot
with the potential for immortality.
Don't hate me because I'm better than you and may destroy you're entire world and life as you know it. |
That, right there, is the real question, the real concern,
the real fascinating and frightening idea.
That is where AI peers through the void to find an answer and finds
something peering back. I don’t fault Blomkamp
and CHAPPiE for hand-waving past a
question that theorists, philosophers, and scientists struggle with. It’s as if he glanced at the idea and ran
(screaming) right past it. That serves
the pace and plot of the movie, but it’s another missed opportunity to really
look through another door that Blomkamp cracked open and never shut.
The future is AI, and thus AI movies (along with scientists
and philosophers) will delve deeper into the questions in, and of, our future—while
having robots fight and blow things up for our amusement. Despite all that, CHAPPiE delivers what it promises, and offers just a glimpse into
more.
No comments:
Post a Comment